Software For Writing Research Papers For Mac

A reader has just challenged me to re-think the software I use for academic work on Mac. Well, there are over 250 items in my Applications folder, but how many do I need to remain productive? So imagine that I have a completely new Mac with no software (except OS and its standard apps). Also imagine that I am not bound to any historical file or data formats.

• Software For Writing Research Papers For Macmillan Pdf
• Check Writing Software For Mac

What would I choose? To answer this, I have made a mission critical list of 25 apps in five categories.

These apps do not duplicate each other, on the contrary some of them are mentioned under more than one heading and some are used together (e.g. I am pretty sure that I could do my professor work with these 25 apps but if any one was removed without replacement I would be severely handicapped.

Reflections and explanations are at the end of the list A. General tools. – a launcher and an automator (€24) /alt:, check for comparison. – Mac typing shortcut utility (€35). – password, identities and other sensitive information management (€40). – file sharing (free) /alt: B. File and e-mail organizing and management.

Citation management software makes mining and using information resources easier and more effective, software for writing research papers for mac helping you to: Capture bibliographic and full-text. Need an article from JSTOR or a preprint from arXiv. Professional Academic Help. Starting from $7.98 per page. Get DISCOUNT Now! Papers Writing Service - Best in San Francisco, Paper Writing Software Mac.

– file management automator, indispensable for (€20). – managing scientific articles, also used for annotation, citation and bibliographies in writing (see D); check (€60) /alt:,.

– a professional search engine; “ goodbye haystack, hello needle!” ($40 or $130 for the professional version) /alt:,. – tagging mail messages in Apple Mail ($30). – processing and organizing email with keyboard shortcuts in Apple Mail ($25) C. Calendar, task and project management. – natural language calendaring, part of the (€16). – professional calendar management (€40) /alt: Mac’s native Calendar.

– outlining for; also used for writing outlines (see D) ($50 or $100 for professional version) /alt:. – project management and planning ($50) /alt:. – unparalleled task management app; however tempting it is,! ($40 or $80 for the professional version /alt:, D. Aleh, Your response to my query has dramatically exceeded all expectations. Thank you for your insights and advice. I have a few of the programs on your list (Omnigraffle/Scrivener/Papers3/MS-Office Suite for Mac), but I will take time over the summer to give my workflow a serious think and getting organised before beginning the last two courses associated with my doctoral programme.

I know that the real work is on the horizon and am already struggling with organising my information/articles. With so much choice on the market, I really appreciate the time and effort that you’ve put into assessing the software tools that exist and sharing your thoughts with us all. I’m going to use your list as THE list to get my own workflow sorted. Thanks again, Aleh. I have been trying Outliner for project management, but the problem is that it must have a separate file for each project. Managing projects in Ulysses is too inefficient.

Eventually after long trying I bought Daylite from Marketcircle and it is very promising but I can’t say there was a sudden revolution in my project management. I will probably use Daylite as a CRM in the future. Now I am trying Circusponies notebooks. Good experience but too early to say whether it will be sustainable. Sorry, I know it’s not a clear-cut solution. Finding a project management software is a pain.

I used to keep project notes in OmniOutliner, and I still largely do. The problem is that then you have to keep a separate file for each project and it complicates capturing and review. I am also using Daylite, it still has not taken up the main project management load despite a lot of work I have put into it. I have started using CircusPonies Notebook, it’s pretty cool for dynamic open-ended ideas but I have no idea whether it will hold for serious projects. Manuel, project management is still a bit of a pain. I am coming to a conclusion that it depends on a “project”.

Some are so simple that they can comfortably live in OmniFocus or even in Mail. Some need a lot of scheduling, but not much thinking and some need a lot of thinking too. Teaching projects are different from writing projects. Yet if you have to have consistency over what software you use for what project. I am now consistently using Daylite for publications.

I use Ulysses a lot for teaching (e.g. Making notes on students presentations), but it’s also backed by OmniOutliner and Scrivener. Ulysses is also good for supervision. I keep using CP Notebooks but it’s not a rigorous PM software for me. I am an avid Mac User and IT Manager in Financial Services, that just started my MBA/MS in Leadership studies. I have spent a lot of dollars in software already, but feel like i am still missing major pieces to help me with taking notes on what i am reading, and making links and managing all the different articles and possibilities. ( It is feeling a bit overwhelming and concerned it will continue to be expensive trying out overlapping tools with the risk of still coming up short.

I haven’t figured out how to properly annotate yet. I have been cutting and pasting paragraphs from PDFs into OmniOutliner so i can highlight important sections, and have a column for summarizing the idea.

But it is getting unwieldy at best. I use Alfred, Keyboard Maestro, Textexpander, 1Password, NVAlt, Hazel, Fantastical, OmniOutliner, Omnifocus, EverNote, Scrivener, and MS Word.

I also have several other tools that i haven’t even touched like Aeon Timeline, and have been trying my hand at Markdown apps as well, but tend to stop at just writing the notes in NVAlt. I am trying to figure out my academic workflow. I keep bouncing back and forth between different tools. The SUMMERFEST is going on for 25% off Tinderbox, DevonThink Pro and NisusWriter Pro, Scrivener. So i was about to invest in all three, hoping it would help me make some sense of a useful workflow. I am wondering if someone can suggest which tools are worth going after, at this point? Or Papers or Foxtrot or Bookends?

Etc., There are so many opinions and I don’t have enough experience in graduate work to know what is useful or not. I have spent a lot of money already, and am about tapped out. While Scrivener is working for writing, i need something to manage my PDFs that are sitting in my inbox from my research on Leadership. I’d like to understand how to do annotations that i can refer to when writing my discussion questions and weekly assignments. What would you sink your money into at this point? Any suggestions would be helpful. Some time since you left this Bryan.

I have found DEVONthink Pro invaluable. As Aleh says everybody has different needs; I started using DEVONthink ‘just’ to store docs for projects, now I use it for everything. I moved my EndNote pdf’s there even. For me it is like the ‘organized chaos’ piles of hard copy I used to have. Where I sort of knew where stuff was somehow! I would give it a try. They give you 140 hours free trial use, I think they know what they are doing: you start with it a bit “meh”, another version of Finder But in time, if you use it, there is a bit of a curve, I think it grows on you and shows its real potential.

Bryan, I understand your frustration. One advice is that you have to find a balance between acquiring and experimenting with new exciting software and actually doing your work, which often requires sticking to software that definitely works for you, however boring. Another advice is to try to analyze and understand your workflows before you jump into a new software. This is important: not to ponder of what you would ideally like to have (because such an ideal thing may not exist in principle), but rather to get insights into how you actually work. Software should work for you, not against you. So study yourself: do you like outlines? Do you need a distraction-free environment for writing?

How would you like to access your notes (and in what contexts)? Then go with some compromises and do not switch to new software before you clearly understand why the old one does not work.

More specifically, I think you should get yourself three things: (a) Scrivener. It will make managing all writing projects easier and may also help with note-taking and research.

(b) Papers (or another reference manager, e.g. Cheaper Bookends) to hold your pdf documents and references together and to cite them in your writings; and (c) a word processor.

The tastes on (c) wildly differ, if you’re not sure what to use why don’t you use Pages and make a list of functions that they don’t have. MS Word has almost all functions imaginable, but you may prefer another alternative. With respect to note-taking and annotation it is a bit more difficult for me to recommend, because my needs are probably quite different. It depends on how many notes you take, to how many subjects they relate, how many papers you annotate etc.

For structured notes I used NValt but now I am more comfortable with Ulysses (which also reads NValt notes). It is important that you have a list of your notes at hand. Scrivener may also do for note-taking. See whether CircusPonies Notebook works for you – it uses another mentality. Finally, why not try Evernote/ Tinderbox is probably better for project management and brainstorming, I find the learning curve pretty steep and I would not recommend to start with it.

DevonThink is a powerful tool but once again you have to be sure it’ll work for you. My (very cautious) reflection is that reading and commenting on literature is a “slow” process. It’s effectiveness depends on how well you’re thinking about the paper, not how beautifully and efficiently you link your notes to it. So while I am leaving some annotations in Papers I often create a separate review/comment document for papers I read (e.g. I rely on my head rather than software to maintain a link between annotations and the paper.

Finally, I have learned to trust myself and to tolerate some imperfection. It is a natural urge to capture, tag, index, cross-link everything so that it hops back at you at precisely the right moment. But knowledge management reality is more complex than this.

You can never anticipate all keywords, groupings and links between your data. On the other hand your mind is amazing: it will often remember things better than you thought. So it is a tango between your brain and a Mac you have to organize in research.

Listen to the rhythm first! Re: notetaking–I found that I’m struggling with too much of a good thing. I learned with real index cards and a pen, and of course in those days we were much more selective about what we took down verbatim. I have been trying recently to only copy and paste if there’s a high probability that I would want to quote from the material directly in an article or lecture. Otherwise, a quick note (“good history of X on pp. 31-35) is sufficient. I remind myself that I access the original almost as quickly as I can access my notes.

I’m still getting tripped up with whether to organize by subject and tag with author, organize with author and tag with subject, or keep double (or more) copies of notes so I can find them easily without too many tags. I completely agree that it takes self-restraint to remember that all the tagging and cross-linking is a means to an end, not an end in itself. These are some brilliant thoughts, Joyce. Especially “I access the original almost as quickly as I can access my notes”. Regarding your wondering about Author vs.

Tagging, here is how I distinguish their functions. If I want a specific paper I very often remember the author (or the title) and have no problem finding it. However, if I want all papers about a specific subject (there is often more than a dozen about a narrowly defined subject of study) I often use search by tags to find all of them. I often perform it when I want to share papers on a particular subject with a student or a colleague or do a literature review and not miss anything. Aleh, Thank you for taking the time to write such an insightful response to my questions and frustrations. I greatly appreciate your advice am amazed at how clearly your words described my approach to the myriad of tools and potential workflows.

I will be taking time, after my next assignment, to slow down and reflect on my process and begin to rely on my abilities more than those of the tools upon which i am trying to lean. I look forward to continuing to follow your blog and hear how your workflows evolve. Thanks for this post. I thought I was so cutting edge using Scrivener but I see I haven’t scratched the surface of what I can do with the Mac.

I have no intention of trying out 20 new apps would love any suggestions for the best addition to my current setup, the biggest “must have” that’s not on my list. Here’s what I’m using: A. General Tools: DROPBOX B. File and e-mail organizing and management – GMAIL online, was using APPLE MAIL but it’s not doing well after downloading Mavericks C. Calendar, task and project management – GOOGLE CALENDAR online, CALENGOO iPhone app (love it) D. Note-taking, research and writing – SCRIVENER (note-taking, writing, lecture notes), KINDLE (device and Mac app for highlighting books and importing to Scrivener), ZOTERO standalone (for keeping track of references), SIMPLENOTE iPhone app (for recording ideas on iPhone to be imported to Scrivener and then deleted), TOODLEDO online and iPhone app (for information that I need to access anywhere), WORD E.

Data processing, presentation and graphic design – EXCEL, POWERPOINT Like. Aleh, I was wondering if you have ever considered QDA apps like NVivo, ATLAS.ti, MAXqda, etc, which would potentially level up, if not revolutionise, your academic workflow beyond note-taking. As they can tag or code/highlight/comment individual parts of PDFs, audio and video files, they seem to be able to replace the note-taking functions of Papers2 or Sente (and without the need to export them). They can also visualise the notes in forms of mind maps, chart, etc. So would they potentially become THE kind of apps for note-taking, literature review, and data analysis?

I’m trying NVivo and MAXqda right now, and thinking of replacing DTP as my main academic repository in the future. P.S.: all the three apps above just have released, or will very soon, their Mac versions and two of which, MAXqda and ATLAS.ti have IOS apps as well, albeit with fairly limited functionality. Although their prices are absurdly high for commercial uses, I, as a student, could buy them at about $100, which is significantly less expensive than other popular apps on Mac like Tinderbox, whose steep learning curve has kept me far away from it Like. Thanks for an interesting article.

However, I am surprised of the vast number of apps in your workflow. Personally, being a student majoring in philosophy, i take great pleasure in using a mac computer, but have a much thinner list of apps to show for. Of course, I don’t do presentations or graphic design, so that limits the list some. Anyway, what I value important in terms of applications, besides its functions and usability, is flexibility and also the company that make the app. If I take a look at the apps in App Store I will see a great many of them at version 1.0 and last updated years ago. Technology is rapidly changing and evolving, therefore its important to find apps made by companies that will last.

Anyway, I just wanted to throw my own list out there and perhaps some of them might serve someone great use. Note-taking, research and writing: Microsoft Onenote.

This has been a reason, perhaps the only one, to stick with a pc until just recently. Microsoft finally made it a native mac app early this year, and it is in my opinion, great. It’s a mac app, iOS app and also web-app, which makes it flexible and as Microsoft is creator, it will last for a while. It’s intuitive, easy to maintain and to get your stuff both in and out of.

Another cool thing is that you can share your notebook with people, so others can edit and contribute. Microsoft word for mac. Being a student i have to follow university rules and formats and docx is what counts. Besides, this is what most of the other non-academic-ninjas use. Exchanging documents and commenting each other etc. Works better when you use the same application and format.

Besides, I think when Office 2014 for mac arrives, the integration between the Office Suite and Onenote will be richer, as it is on the pc today. For outlining academic work such as assignments and papers. Also great for taking notes in lectures and brainstorming.

Scrivener: For dynamic works of complexity that involves research, notes, drafts and revisions. Adobe Acrobat Pro: Lots of the articles and pdf’s i get are copied material from books, making them impossible to mark and annotate. The OCR module in acrobat pro is superb and makes the pdf’s workable. The edu prices on this piece of software is pretty affordable. Organizing and management Endnote: For references and pdf management. Industry standard, robust company, flexible, often updated and syncs to the cloud.

I want to be particularly sure on this piece of software because this is where i store the material i find for my studies that eventually turns into exams and grades. Todoist: Great to-do manager, available on all platforms. Nice design, great sync and a cool set of features. Really cheap too, considering to the functionality you get. Thats it really, for the rest i use the basic stuff already loaded on the mac.besides of course dropbox for storing the files. My workflow is like this: I add tasks in Todoist.

Notes and research starts in Onenote. I outline it in Omnioutliner and reference it in Endnote. Then i write and deliver it in Word. I guess i’m a lightweight ninja, but perhaps ninjas shouldn’t carry that much stuff around:) Best regards Samuel Like. General Tools: LaunchBar, PathFinder, Things, TaskPaper, Dropbox, 1Password, TextExpander, Keynote, Unclutter, PopClip, etc. Bucket apps (sort, organize, categorize, tag, naming, searching, linking): Sente, DEVONthink Pro Office, MacJournal, Clearview. Note taking (read, extract, paraphrase, summarize): DEVONthink, MacJournal, Sente, Skim, SimpleNote, WriteRoom, OmniOutliner (research notes from others applications are imported to DEVONthink „Zettelkasten” database).

Deeper sense-making (outline, mind-mapping, visualize, hypothesize, structure): OmniOutliner, Scapple, Tinderbox, iThoughtsX, NovaMind. Writing: Scrivener, Nisus Writer Pro, Pages. Brainstorming and organizing ideas: MindNode or iThoughtsX.

Search: DevonAgent Pro to do deep Web searches (it takes a while to do a deep search). Highly recommended, especially if used in combination with Devonthink. HoudahSpot for local search. Gather: Devonthink Pro Office for gathering information directly from DevonAgent; and CP Notebook for note taking and organizing notes.

Bookends for gathering references from Pubmed, Scopus, and other DBs. Composing and referencing: After I have my map completed, I save the map as an OPML file and open in Omnioutliner, if I’m working on a paper; or in Scrivener if I’m working on a book. I insert most references at this point (Cmd-Y in Bookends to either OO or Scrivener). Save the file as rtf to open in a word processor. Formatting: NisusWriter Pro or Pages for final referencing and final format. If I have to work with colleagues, I import them into MSW as rtf files before sending.

My workflow changes depending on whether I’m first author or not. When I’m not first author I just receive the document in Word and use that. If I’m first author I follow my workflow and at the end take other authors’ inputs into my workflow (I request my colleagues to use rtf or txt as a file format). Output: MSWord or PDF Other writing/formatting program I use for personal documents, such as a course syllabus or my CVs, is Lyx, which I use also when I have to submit the paper formatted as a LaTeX document, with Output in PDF. The useful thing about using a LaTeX app is that you don’t have to worry about formatting, and that it produces beautiful outputs.

So many apps. I have to say, I think it sounds like a system like that works you, and not -for- you.

I think that file-management, research, note taking, and writing are all part of the same thing. As a hobbiest software developer, I realize that it is much easier to focus on narrow problems and solutions. But I am exceptionally frustrated that there are so many apps that do one -tiny- piece of the puzzle well, and fail at, or don’t consider, the other tasks. I feel like Charlie Gordon: can’t you software developers see the connections!!! Why is there a distinction between annotating academic PDFs and storing notes about them, and the eventual text used for a paper or thesis? Why does DevonThink do a great job of storing files and even finding similarities, but doesn’t let me add connections, or prune improper ones?

Why does Evernote hoover everything up so well into a giant blackhole, from which everything seems to get lost? Why should I have a tool just to manage citations? I’d like to see the baby of DevonThink, Scrivener, OneNote, Papers, GoodReader, and OmniOutliner. One tool to rule all the researching, thought-development, notes, writing, and file management. On a related note, I have a similar beef with OmniFocus. It’s great for tracking tasks for large projects (although the iPhone version is missing the most powerful features). But if you use it for personal tasks, especially daily habits or reminders (which I consider just as important), their very strange database just blows up; it can’t handle you completing dozens of repeating tasks every day.

And the priority and tagging mechanism is exceptionally limited. I was just wondering what you use for managing contacts and/or keeping track of funding applications?

I’m about to apply for a large number of grants and am looking desperately for something which will let me record contact with each potential funder, preferably something a bit more intelligent than an excel spreadsheet. At the same time, I’m also about to embark on some fieldwork, so it would be good to record contact details and log correspondence with various people. I’m guessing my last resort would be Devonthink and storing spreadsheets and notes, but I was hoping for a more database like software – perhaps such a thing doesn’t exist? Hi Aleh, One app I can’t live without right now is TapForms.

It is a personal database manager, it syncs with iPhone and its very versatile nature allows me to add almost any kind of information in it. I use it for both personal and professional matters. For instance I have a “database” (called “form”) specifically designed to handle part of theories, linked with another database related to papers.

That way I can track what I’ve read very precisely, with almost no impact on my reading speed. And I’m sure I don’t have discovered yet all its usages. Wow that looks like an expensive list! Here’s my broke student alternative recommendations: application launching, file searching, automation – alfredapp ($28 for pro) text expander – atext ($4) reference/pdf management – bibdesk calendar – iCal + quick cal ($3) notes+task management – workflowy writing – LyX or Sublime Text PDF reading – skim data processing – Rstudio vector graphics – Dia In many cases, the free/inexpensive version is equal or superior to the expensive alternatives. The expensive ones only exist because people don’t bother to look around, and large businesses like to have fancy brand names.

For example, atext has more functionality than text expander. Bib desk and Skim are highly scriptable and thus can be extended far beyond their paid counterparts (you don’t have to do this work because someone else already has). Workflowy blows omni-outliner/focus out of the water in my opinion. Alfred app is the only app over $5 I recommended because it changed my computer use in a huge way. It is highly extendable and thus has been integrated with most scriptable applications out there.

For example, if I want to check out a paper, I hit ⌘-space, type “ref tamasello item based nature 2000”, hit enter, and bib desk opens up with a formatted and bibtel-form citation, along with a pdf of the paper. (Reference Importer Workflow). You don’t need to spend a whole bunch of money to have a great workflow. OK, so here were my computers:. 2009 MBP 15” + iPad 1 – very unwieldy and sync with iPad was very painful at that time;. 2011 – 13” MBAir, no iPad; was a huge relief in the beginning, then I got gradually frustrated with the screen and 4GB RAM was no longer enough;. 2013 – 15” MBP Retina – it was actually much lighter than the first MBP and even lighter than older MBP 13”; yes, it’s a bit too heavy, but i LOVE the screen and speed;.

2014 – added iPad Air so I no longer need to get MBP out of my bag on the airplanes and in meetings; significant improvement. No doubt MacBook Pro 15” Retina. I think iPad is indeed a luxury in my profession. I use it almost exclusively in airplanes where it is clumsy (but still possible) to get my MacBook out. I travel a lot, but it still does not make a fundamental difference. A lot has been written how it is good to come with an iPad to meetings (it is but then a paper notebook also works) and sit on a sofa doing OmniFocus reviews But that’s a definition of luxury. On the other hand MacBook Pro 15” retina would be a huge change in your daily work experience.

Thanks for all your Mac software articles, they’ve been quite helpful. I’ve been particularly following everything you have to say on Papers3 as I’m beginning to compile a library of papers for my PhD work (in Papers2) and don’t want to be stuck using a buggy program – I’d like to migrate to a different platform earlier rather than later if need be. Given your familiarity with so many productivity apps, do you know of any good way to snag pictures of figures from the articles I’m reading so I can tag them/comment on them to search for later? Thanks for the great post and comments. I had been using the Scapple software to do quick conceptual maps/models. I find very simple to master. However, not having an iPad version is a deal breaker for me.

Are you aware of a similar products? I looked into iThoughtsHD, but didn’t seem to fit the bill. BTW, I used to be a heavy OneNote user back in the Windows days, and since the release of the Mac version, I am in love with it again. I have moved most of my notes from Evernote. Their iOS app is a great companion.

Hi Aleh, I wonder whether you or anyone else can give me some advice on file backup and file synchronization solutions. I am currently using a cloud-based synchronization software to sync files between my office and home computers. Because of some serious issues encountered, I am thinking of either 1) abandoning this software in search of a better one for file synchronization, or 2) abandoning the idea of cloud-based synchronization entirely and stick to only file backup solutions (cloud based or not). Under this scenario, I would use one dedicated computer for all my academic work.

Below is more details: I see that you listed ‘DropBox’ under General Tools. However, a serious disadvantage with DropBox is that you have to drag things into the DropBox drive/folder, which can destroy your file/folder structure/path. What I have been using is SugarSync which overcomes the Dropbox problem described above. You can select whatever files or folders to sync without having to move anything. I set up synchronization between my Work and Home computers. This way, when I finish work in the office, I go straight home and, after SygarSync finishes updating the files in my home computer, I can continue working on my home laptop.

And vice versa. And I thought it was a true liberation (from having to lug around a laptop). However, recently, I discovered a serious problem with the software. To put it simply, while it works fine most of the time, sometimes it fails to sync files without any warning, with very grave consequences. For example, say a certain file is of Version N and is synced between my two computers (through their server). I do some work on the file on my office computer and the file’s version become N +1 (as an example).

When I get home, and my home computer finishes synchronization (via the cloud), I would expect the file to have been updated to N +1. Except that in some cases, the file fails to be updated, remaining version N, unbeknownst to me because there is absolutely no warning about failure. So I open the file and begin to work on it. If I am not very careful, or if the time lapse between N and N+1 is big, there is a good chance that I will not even notice the file’s version is still N. So, I work on the file (could be important things like manuscripts, reading notes, etc), and save it and let’s call this file version N+2. SugarSync will consider this version to be the latest one because of the timestamp. It then sends it to the cloud, and, when the other computer (office computer) boots and finishes synchronization, will replace the N+1 file in the office computer with the N +2 file sent from home.

You now see the sinister nature of this problem. It means the work I did between N and N+1 in my office computer is lost, and I may not even know it.

Needless to say, when I found out about it, I was in great shock, and I was furious. Right now, I am thinking of two solutions: 1. Keep a cloud-based file/folder synchronization arrangement (between office and home computers) because it is liberating (you can work on the same thing on two computers, and don’t have to lug around a laptop), but search for a better software that does not have the issues I have encountered. If I go for this solution, then what would that problem-free software be? Any suggestions? Abandon the idea of cloud-based synchronization entirely and recognize the fact that for something as important as academic work, one simply cannot trust a cloud-based software to update and delete files across computers. Instead, do all academic work on one dedicated computer only.

Cloud-based backup software can still be used to continuously back up files to the server (backing up files instead of synchronizing them between computers does not come with the problem described above, because the server does not automatically replace files in your computers). At the same time, also use an external hard drive to regularly back up the entire hard drive. Any suggestions from you, your colleagues, or fellow readers?

Have you considered building your own cloud service using a network-attached storage (NAS)? At the moment I use a Synology NAS to keep my working files syncronized between a Macbook and iMac, which works quite well with “Cloud Station”. In our institute it is not permitted to use internet based cloud services because of security issues anyway – and my personal opinion about this is quite the same I do not feel comfortable keeping my files where I do not have direct control about them, so I do not use Dropbox or similar services for work. Synchronizing over NAS is done as soon, as my laptop connects to my network at home, but the NAS can also be configured to have VPN ports, which can be accessed from the internet. Maybe I would do that, if I also had a stationary mac at work, but this is not the case at the moment. The NAS is also used for my regular Time Machine backups btw. I second this approach.

I love, love, love my Synology Diskstation (1513+). It works fantastic as a Time Machine Backup, and I use the Cloud Station capability.

I place all my Scrivener docs, OmniOutlines, NValt notes, Mindnode maps and Word docs into my Cloud station folders on each of my Apple devices (supports MacOS, IOS, Windows and Android.) I also scan everything using a Scansnap ix500 connected to my mac-mini. Scans get OCR’d and dropped into an actions folder, which Hazel watches, tags and moves to different folders, all managed by CloudStation. Like Dropbox, it synchs all my folders/docs (or the ones I select per device) to my Diskstation, macbook, mac-mini, iPad and iPhone. This Christmas break i plan to test out the Notes app, which is an Evernote substitute for making everything private.

I will also test out a few DevonThink databases. I also use it as a video server for my home theater system using Plex. I also have the DiskStation synching a number of critical files (taxes, receipts, research, etc.) with an old Drobo, which is offsite, just for good measure and backup strategy. I get the benefit of having a dual-disk redundancy RAID array, with multiple backups of critical files, while maintaining all my data in a privately and with drive encryption.

@Bryan: I already use the NAS for my “work” DevonThink database. Syncing works great – the only thing to remember is: Aliases within the database need to point to files within the Cloudstation root folder – but this should not be much of a hassle. A couple of weeks ago I tried out some task management software and was quite impressed by OmniFocus – one reason is, that it supports private WebDav servers to sync its database, which I feel much more comfortable with compared to the services storing data in the cloud. It was not the easiest task to set up the Synology WebDav server, but after some attempts I have it running now together with OmniFocus. Perhaps I misunderstood, but if you actually use all of the apps on this list, you are spending your time testing software and procrastinating instead of actually doing academic work. Here’s my rebuttal: 1. This is totally overkill.

Many of the apps duplicate each other and provide similar functionality. Finally, you seem to have a penchant for “pro” versions and paid apps when free ones are usually as good or better. The paid/pro versions are for power users who will take advantage of every feature. So here’s my list: -Revolution R Open & Rstudio for stats (free) -Sublime 3 (free or $70 for a no-nag version). It has full screen editing and tons of add-ons, so no need for Byword, etc.Dropbox (Pro $100 per year, to fit up to 1tb of data) -Filezilla or cyberduck (free/paid, for FTP transfers) -GitHub and GitHub for Mac (free for public collaboration / paid for private) -iTerm/terminal (both free, but iTerm is better) -Gmail/gcal (use ical/mac mail if you prefer, all are free) -MS Office (paid, but $30 with student discount.

Avoid it like the plague, but use it if you must with collaborators) -Zotero and Bibdesk for reference management (in Word or in LaTeX both free!) -MacTex with either Sublime 3 (above) or TexWorks (all free!) And most importantly: -AppCleaner (free to remove all the other programs you won’t need) You’ll notice there is only one paid app (Office 2011) and a paid service (Dropbox) on my list. With a little creativity, I could probably do without both, but choose them for convenience, or obligation due to others forcing.docx on me. And in all of the cases above, I’m not choosing the free versions out of cheapness.

It’s just that the open-source software options are generally much better than the paid alternatives. For example, can you name a single reference management software that can so easily import references from the web like Zotero? None do, because they have the best import translators for the most sites. If all you want is PubMed and a couple of other specific databases, Papers might work, that is if you can overlook all the bugs. Neither Papers 2 nor Papers 3 currently even work on Yosemite!

How can anyone tolerate that kind of lag/crash from a paid app? One other big advantage of the open source apps is cross-platform compatibility. So I can use the same app on a Windows PC (if I absolutely must) or on a Linux rig (with delight!).

Yes, I use all the apps (actually some other as well). In response of your explicit and implied questions: – Yes, I find it rational and efficient to use a fraction of money that I spend on hardware to buy software; especially from clever and creative developers; otherwise I think I am not making most of my computers; I’d be naturally suspicious of a ‘free’ or ‘Open Source’ Mac or iPad, the same often applies to apps; – No, I do not necessarily prefer Pro versions, I simply indicate this options. I know that this thread is about essential software for the academic, but I was wondering if there might be hardware solutions that are working particularly well for the doctoral students or professional researchers amongst those that subscribe to Aleh’s excellent Blog. For example, somewhere in this thread, there were positive comments with regard to Synology intelligent NAS solutions, which include a lot of what I would call server-like and cloud based applications as standard software.

Perhaps some of the recommended software that Aleh proposed lends itself to personally hosted smart NAS solutions (using Web DAV perhaps), rather than having to rely on a cloud based solution ‘out there’ in the omnipresent cloud. As I contemplate the research phase of doctoral work (perhaps end of 2015), I know that I will need to address issues of data security, communications medium and where servers are located if I use the ‘cloud’ for surveys or storage of data/documents etc, as it relates to research and information gathered from participants.

Because of the complications related to different interpretations of privacy legislation here in Canada and the United States and the application of the US Patriot Act to access otherwise private information related to Canadian based research (hosted on american servers), I am contemplating consolidating much of my cloud storage and cooperative work that is currently linked in Box, DropBox, and iCloud, and hosting this on a private cloud solution here in my home in Canada. I would like to be able to gather and share information with a small group of participants and start building a sense of community for my action research team. As part of the ethics review process for the research, I must be clear to my future participants what safeguards that I’m taking with their information (physical security of the server, encryption, geographical location of the data, etc). I’m not sure if my idea of hosting such a technological solution out of my home is ‘crazy’ and not particularly feasible, but before I started looking for Canadian commercial or possibly university resources, I thought that I would post to Aleh’s blog and tap the expertise of others. Technologically and academically challenged, John Like. I have gladly left Apple Mail for Postbox (based on Thunderbird). It has cool calm typography.

Software For Writing Research Papers For Macmillan Pdf

I have several accounts: I can either see all of them or hide away those I’m not concentrating on for the moment. Its best feature is speedy tagging and filing. I have a few tags—like check, act, reply, (all with different initial letters). To tag something in the mail list view, I just type “t” then the first letter. To file something I type “v” and then the first one or two letters of the folder and it offers me the alternatives; mostly the folder I want is at the top of the list: hit return and it’s filed away. I have a lot of folders because it’s no hassle to file things. It took a bit of time to reorganise things once I had imported from Mail to Postbox but it was absolutely worth it.

Aleh: Thanks for all your work. I’ve visited your blog for many years, and always enjoyed reading it. I am a long-time Mac user, but had a Windows-life before that. I am still (7 years now!) grieving the loss of Citavi, which only works on Windows. After countless attempts with other software (you know the bunch) I decided to set up the nasty parallels/windows system, and work with it again. Despite some tiny hickups, it is great. Did you ever look at it?

Check Writing Software For Mac

Although neither native nor any perspective for going native, it really is my favourite citing/quoting tool. Sebastian Like.